Friday, April 14, 2017

College Hazing (Blog post 2)

On February 4th 2017 Timothy Piazza, a 19 year old Penn State University Student from Readington Township New Jersey, lost his life after falling down a set of basement stairs in The Beta Theta Pi Fraternity home. That night Piazza was pledging the fraternity. After falling down the flight of stairs he had to wait nearly 12 hours until medical help was contacted. He was flown to Hershey medical center where he was pronounced dead.  
Vice President of Student Affairs at Penn State put out a statement following the incident. He states "from what we know is that this was a hazing ritual and it involved the gross misuse amounts of alcohol." Since the incident along with many others Penn State is taking action by putting a hold on Fall Rush for all fraternities and sororities. Penn State is not the only higher education school that is having students die from hazing in Greek life. This is starting to become a rising issue on college campus across the county.  
Melanie Dostis from USA Today states that "the frequency of hazing-related injuries and deaths is further cause for many students and experts to feel the outdated tradition should have no place in modern culture" Dostis article uses ethos to connect to her audience she uses the statistic presented by University of Maine that  found 55% of college students across the country that are involved in clubs and organizations admitted to being hazed. Dostis also uses pathos by giving chilling hazing stories such as the 2010 case at Radford University where a pledge member in TKE (Tau Kappa Epsilon) was forced to chug an entire bottle of alcohol with in an hour. The pledge membered died with a blood alcohol level six times the limit. Six of the TKE brothers were arrested and put in jail for two years and a $1000 fine. The tone of Dostsis article is very strongly opinionated on why hazing is bad and why "disrespecting and humiliation a person in any way is not acceptable" as she puts it in her article. She also uses social proof by using the statistics and words from actual students who suffered outlandish hazing experiences she is showing that what everyone thinks about how hazing is bad is the truth. Along with using these types of stories and statistics in the article she builds a scenes of urgency that we must put a stop to all hazing which she also covers how some schools are working with their greek life organizations to enforcing no hazing policies.  
When you type college hazing into google you get articles on why it is bad, but what if hazing has some benefits to it? John Talty of the International Business Times, wrote the benefits to hazing in fraternities and sororities. Although Talty agrees that some of the hazing deaths are unfortunate he shares that hazing has its benefits. Saying that some social greek life groups as part of hazing you must complete study hours which makes you focus more on school. He also puts in how many CEO's in America were once pledges of fraternities and sororities. He says "Hazing wasn’t the sole reason on why they are successful, but defiantly changed their outlook on life. Talty also makes the argument that why isn't US military training considered hazing. He states that no one calls it hazing because in the public eyes it builds character and prepares the individual for the future. He says this is what hazing on school campus' are. "It turns boys into men and girls into women". Taltys argument is tapping Pathos, although he does not use any facts or creatable sources he does speak about how hazing help others along with himself. Talty's tone throughout this article seemed hostile at the fact that everyone thinks hazing is bad although he does agree that some the of hazing stories being way to . 


http://www.ibtimes.com/why-hazing-can-lead-positive-change-224185

Friday, February 24, 2017

No Toilets for Tans (Blog post #1)

          Within the resent days of President Trump being elected into office, many are scratching their heads and left with questions of why and how when it comes to his choices as president. His recent choice of leaving it up to the states to keep Obama' s regulations on transgender friendly bathrooms in State funded schools is splitting the country in half. Throughout Trumps campaign he continued to state how he wanted to give the states the power again. With an issue like Gender neutral bathrooms in public schools Trump said that it’s not an issue that should not be left at the federal level but should be left up to the states. He wants to revoke the bill letting Trans students use bathrooms of their own and give the state the power to decide if they want to protect Transgender rights.    
      The infamous Tomi Lahren from The Blaze had a few words to say about the Transgender bathrooms. She states that Trump is simply returning Americas bathrooms back to normal. Along with stating " The Trump administration will undo President Obama's free for all Bathroom dictate, which was a infringement on states  rights in the first place." Tomi's point of view that Obama's bill was just a bathroom free for all that allows "a safe space for transgenders but also a place for creeps and pedophiles" is mostly unjustified and washed down for the right wing media. Tomi also speaks negatively about how left wing media is blowing it out of proportion and how its just a bunch of "fake news and B.S. to feed the sheep of the left." 
           Tomi Larhen from The  Blaze must not understand how a the left wing media is covering this topic. CNN a majority of left wing a democratic points of views states all the facts. Saying how Trump is simply not repealing the entire bill but leaving it up to the states and schools. CNN shares a statement from the White house about the joint decision from the Department of Justice and Department of Education saying "the new policy will pave the way for an open and inclusive process to take place at the local level with input from parents, students, teachers and administrators". They also state how the new secretary of the Department of Education, Betsy DeVos is for the LGBT community and stands behind trump choice. She sates that she would not stand behind something if it would to potentially harm any young American citizen.  

For me I believe that the states should have more of a say when it comes to bills that come out of our capital. However, when it comes to the transgender bathroom issue I see it as the bill was already created and helped out many so why revoke it? Many Transgender and LGBT students are subjugated to harassment just for having to use the bathroom. The Trans community struggles to get respect and have their issues heard. The bathroom situation was an issue that was resolved and sure many didn’t agree with the choice. However, one thing I fear is some states and schools revoking it leaving the Transgendered youth subjugated to more harassment and bullying. What are your opinions? Do you think Trump should have revoked the bill and left it to the states and school systems to decide or should have kept Obama's original bill?